Legal Opinion

Hazeltine v. Granger

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided October 27, 1880PublishedCited by 36 opinions

Appeal from the Superior Court of Grand Rapids. Foreclosure. Defendant appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtCampbell, J.

Hazeltine filed his bill to foreclose a mortgage for $3400 due in five years from March 1, 1878, with interest at 7 per cent, payable semi-annually. One instalment of interest having, as is claimed, remained unpaid, the bill sets forth an election to have the whole sum become due, it being averred that this was provided for in the mortgage, as well as a fee of fifty dollars, on each proceeding to foreclose. It also avers that the mortgage secured to the mortgagee a right to the rents and profits after default, and the right to have a receiver appointed without notice. It appeared that the…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Hogsett v. EllisMichigan Supreme Court · 1868
  2. Wagar v. StoneMichigan Supreme Court · 1877
  3. Ladue v. Detroit & Milwaukee RailroadMichigan Supreme Court · 1865
  4. Caruthers v. HumphreyMichigan Supreme Court · 1864
  5. Crippen v. MorrisonMichigan Supreme Court · 1864

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by36 opinions

  1. People v. MarchMichigan Supreme Court · 2016
  2. Detroit Trust Co. v. Detroit City Service Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1933
  3. Nusbaum v. ShaperoMichigan Supreme Court · 1930
  4. Rothenberg v. FollmanMichigan Court of Appeals · 1969
  5. Norfor v. BusbyWashington Supreme Court · 1898

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API