Legal Opinion

In Re Complaint of Hedges

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided October 18, 1977No. TC 1233, SC 25316PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Per curiam

In this disciplinary proceeding the Accused is charged with conduct alleged to be unethical and in violation of the applicable standards of professional conduct. The Oregon State Bar’s complaint contains three causes. The first concerns the Accused’s actions with respect to a real property transaction; the second concerns his handling of a probate matter; the third is the aggregate of the first two. The Accused filed an answer denying that he was guilty of those charges. Most of the facts were stipulated before the Trial Board, and there are no important conflicts in the evidence.

With respect…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of HubertOregon Supreme Court · 1973
  2. In re Complaint as to the Conduct of PrestonOregon Supreme Court · 1974

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Bob Godfrey Pontiac, Inc. v. RoloffOregon Supreme Court · 1981
  2. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of LeonardOregon Supreme Court · 1989
  3. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of EnglishOregon Supreme Court · 1980
  4. Bob Godfrey Pontiac, Inc. v. RoloffOregon Supreme Court · 1981

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API