Legal Opinion

In re Complaint as to the Conduct of Preston

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided August 1, 1974PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Per curiam

This is a disciplinary proceeding. The accused attorney is an Assistant Attorney General and represents the State Accident Insurance Fund. The bar charged the accused with making false statements to a hearings officer and opposing counsel.

The parties stipulated to the basic facts.

*272In a workmen’s compensation hearing a subpoenaed witness for the Accident Fund failed to appear. Counsel for the parties agreed upon six written interrogatories to be submitted to the witness. The accused sent the interrogatories to the witness. On March 16th the witness returned the answered interrogatories to the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of HubertOregon Supreme Court · 1973

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Bob Godfrey Pontiac, Inc. v. RoloffOregon Supreme Court · 1981
  2. In Re Complaint of HedgesOregon Supreme Court · 1977
  3. In re the Adoption & Change of Name of WalkerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1982
  4. Bob Godfrey Pontiac, Inc. v. RoloffOregon Supreme Court · 1981

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API