Legal Opinion

Jack v. National Bank

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided September 6, 1906PublishedCited by 28 opinions

Error from the District Court of Garfield County; before James K. Beauchamp, Trial Judge.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the court by

Hainer, J.:

There is very little, if any, dispute concerning the material facts in this case.

On December 12, 1903, the Southwestern Bridge & Iron Company filed in the office of the county clerk of Garfield county its account against said county in the sum of $1435.

On April 12, 1904, H. H. Watkins, a stockholder and director of the Southwestern Bridge & Iron Company representing himself to be the treasurer of said corporation, sold and assigned said account to plaintiff in error, J. P. Jack, the said assignment being made upon the back of the original claim on file in the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Spain v. Hamilton's AdministratorSupreme Court of the United States · 1864
  2. Methven v. Staten Island Light, Heat & Power Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1895

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. Salem Trust Co. v. Manufacturers' Finance Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1924
  2. Citizens' Nat. Bank of Chickasha v. MitchellSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1909
  3. Minnetonka Oil Co. v. Cleveland Vitrified Brick Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1910
  4. J. I. Case Threshing MacH. Co. v. Lyons Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
  5. Victory Inv. Corp. v. Muskogee Electric Traction Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1945

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API