Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

People v. Park

Criminal Court of the City of New York

Decided December 8, 1995PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Robert E. Torres, J.

Pursuant to CPL 30.30 and 170.30, the defendant, Donghawan Park, seeks to dismiss the accusatory instrument. The court denies defendant’s motion to dismiss.

*343On May 12, 1995, in the early morning, defendant, Donghawan Park, was arrested, charged with operating a motor vehicle while under the influence of alcohol (Vehicle and Traffic Law § 1192 [2], [3]), and arraigned. Vehicle and Traffic Law § 1192 is a misdemeanor punishable by imprisonment for up to one year. Therefore, the People have 90 days from the commencement of the criminal action to be ready…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. People v. AndersonNew York Court of Appeals · 1985
  2. People v. CortesNew York Court of Appeals · 1992
  3. People v. EnglandNew York Court of Appeals · 1994
  4. People v. NavarroAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987
  5. People v. Dun ChinCriminal Court of the City of New York · 1989

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. People v. Chen LuCriminal Court of the City of New York · 2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API