Legal Opinion
Levine v. Conner
District Court, N.D. California
Decided February 28, 2008No. C 05-04764 MHPPublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
MARILYN HALL PATEL, District Judge.
Plaintiffs are: 1) poultry eaters concerned about food-borne illnesses; and 2) organizations representing poultry slaughterhouse workers concerned about working conditions. On November 21, 2005 plaintiffs filed the instant case against the United States Department of Agriculture (“USDA”) challenging the USDA’s interpretive rule excluding chickens, turkeys and other poultry species from the Humane Methods Slaughter Act (“HMSA”) of 1958, 7 U.S.C. §§ 1901 et seq. Now before the court are the parties’ cross-motions for summary judgment. The court has…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Immigration & Naturalization Service v. Cardoza-FonsecaSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Robinson v. Shell Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1997
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Levine v. VilsackCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
- United States v. ParkCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
- Ellen Levine v. Edward T. SchaferCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
- United States v. ParkCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008