Legal Opinion

United States v. Park

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided August 11, 2008No. 06-35886PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McKEOWN, Circuit Judge:

Ron and Mary Park own and operate a dog kennel, Wild River Kennels, on property along the Clearwater River in Idaho. Their property is subject to a scenic easement that was granted to the United States, which prohibits commercial activity but permits livestock farming. In this appeal, we are asked to determine the unusual question whether dogs are “livestock.” Despite a gut inclination that the answer might be “no,” resolution of the issue is not so clear, thus precluding summary judgment at this stage of the proceeding. As it turns out, the term “livestock” is…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Barnhart v. ThomasSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
  2. United States v. Little Lake Misere Land Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1973
  3. Benninger v. DerifieldIdaho Supreme Court · 2006
  4. Neider v. ShawIdaho Supreme Court · 2003
  5. Matter of Estate of KirkIdaho Supreme Court · 1995

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Lazy J Ranches Limited Partnership v. United States of America and United States Forest ServiceDistrict Court, D. Montana · 2026
  2. United States v. ParkDistrict Court, D. Idaho · 2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API