Legal Opinion
Hauser v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance
California Court of Appeal
Decided October 20, 1988No. C003463PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
PUGLIA, P. J.
Plaintiffs and cross-defendants Harold and Eileen Hauser (respectively husband and wife; collectively plaintiffs) appeal from the judgment entered in favor of defendant and cross-complainant State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company (State Farm). The cross-actions sought a declaration of the limits of liability in an insurance policy issued by State Farm. The trial court granted State Farm’s motion for summary judgment and plaintiffs appeal. We shall affirm.
The facts are undisputed. Husband sustained bodily injuries in a motor vehicle accident with John H. Craft.…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Rodriguez v. Bethlehem Steel Corp.California Supreme Court · 1974
- Abellon v. Hartford InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985
- Underwriters Insurance v. PurdieCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1983
- State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. BallCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1981
- Barrett v. Farmers Insurance GroupCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Carson v. Mercury InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2012
- Gonzales v. Allstate InsuranceNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1996
- Jauregui v. Mid-Century InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1991
- Mid-Century Insurance v. BashCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1989
- Federal Kemper Insurance v. KarletWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1993
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.