Legal Opinion

Barrett v. Farmers Insurance Group

California Court of Appeal

Decided October 28, 1985No. B009443PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

COMPTON, J.

The sole issue on this appeal is whether several uninsured motorist coverages issued by the same insurance company to the same insured may be “stacked” or pyramided so that the benefits under the policies are payable in an amount exceeding the limits of any one of the separate uninsured motorist coverages.

The essential facts are not in dispute. In March 1981, plaintiffs Paul Barrett and Sara Gentry sustained serious injuries when their motorcycle collided with an automobile driven by one La Preal Bauer. Each plaintiff subsequently recovered $25,000, the maximum coverage…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Home Indemnity Co. v. Leo L. Davis, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1978
  2. Betty Lee Tholen v. Harvis L. Carney, Cathrene E. Greenhaw, Safeco Insurance Company of America, Intervenor-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1977
  3. Rudder v. Farmers Insurance ExchangeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1980
  4. California State Automobile Ass'n Inter-Insurance Bureau v. HoffmanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1978

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Julian v. Hartford Underwriters InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 2005
  2. Fireman's Fund Insurance v. Allstate InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1991
  3. American Star Insurance Co. v. Insurance Co. of the WestCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1991
  4. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. CraneCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1990
  5. Fagundes v. American International Adjustment Co.California Court of Appeal · 1992

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API