Legal Opinion

Yasulis v. Yasulis

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided February 3, 1959PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMartin, C. J.

It is well established that:

“The division of property, in a case of this sort, is peculiarly a matter resting in the discretion of the trial court, subject to such rules as have been established by this court for guidance in respect to the matter. Therefore, the trial determination must prevail unless clearly characterized by mistake or some manifest error respecting the detail facts upon which it rests, or disregard of established guides, amounting to a pretty clear want of judicial discretion or judgment.” Gauger v. Gauger (1914), 157 Wis. 630, 632, 147 N. W. 1075.

Appellant maintains that…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Gauger v. GaugerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1914
  2. Barrock v. BarrockWisconsin Supreme Court · 1950
  3. Hull v. HullWisconsin Supreme Court · 1956
  4. Kalbakken v. KalbakkenWisconsin Supreme Court · 1929

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Lacey v. LaceyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1970
  2. Kronforst v. KronforstWisconsin Supreme Court · 1963
  3. Leighton v. LeightonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1978
  4. Trowbridge v. TrowbridgeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1962
  5. Molloy v. MolloyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1970

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API