Legal Opinion

Leighton v. Leighton

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided January 3, 1978No. 75-545PublishedCited by 45 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtEobeet W. Hansen, J.

This appeal of a portion of a judgment of divorce brings for review only the trial court’s division of the assets of the parties and the denial of alimony to the plaintiff-wife.

THE “LACEY” APPROACH.

In his memorandum decision the trial judge stated that he sought to divide the property of the parties “as equally as I can,” and under Lacey, 1 on this record, that endeavor was appropriate. Until Lacey the starting point and, often enough, the finishing point was “. . . one third of the marital estate to the wife ... to be increased or decreased only by special circumstances.” 2 In Lacey this…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Wilder v. WilderWashington Supreme Court · 1975
  2. Miner v. MinerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1960
  3. Lacey v. LaceyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1970
  4. Kronforst v. KronforstWisconsin Supreme Court · 1963
  5. Johnson v. JohnsonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1977

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by45 opinions

  1. In RE MARRIAGE OF COOK v. CookWisconsin Supreme Court · 1997
  2. Damiano v. DamianoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983
  3. Helmbrecht v. St. Paul InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1985
  4. In Re Marriage of HuntAppellate Court of Illinois · 1979
  5. Deering v. DeeringCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1981

40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API