Legal Opinion
Crockett v. SRA International
District Court, D. Maryland
Decided May 1, 2013No. Civil Action No. 8:13-cv-00261-AWPublishedCited by 24 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
ALEXANDER WILLIAMS, JR., District Judge.
Pending before the Court is Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss. The Court has re*568viewed the record and deems a hearing unnecessary. For the following reasons, the Court GRANTS Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss.
I. FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND
Plaintiff Kimberly Crockett is an African-American female who resides in Maryland. Defendant SRA International is an international corporate and government consulting company that does business in Maryland. Plaintiff worked for Defendant from September 2003 until August 2011.
In 2003, Defendant hired…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Papasan v. AllainSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Burlington Northern & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. WhiteSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
- Clark County School District v. BreedenSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Hawkins v. LeggettDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2013
- Abdul-Musawir Williams v. Newport News School BoardDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 2021
- Eke v. United TherapeuticsDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2023
- Fisher v. J.O. Spice and Cure Company, Inc.District Court, D. Maryland · 2020
- Franovich v. HansonDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2023
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.