United States v. Withers
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by Judge PREGERSON; Dissent by Judge NOONAN.
ORDER
In response to a petition for panel rehearing from Plaintiff-Appellee United States of America, the majority opinion filed August 19, 2010, slip op. 12207, and appearing at 618 F.3d 1008 (9th Cir.2010), is hereby amended as follows:
At slip op. at 12220, line 31 [618 F.3d at 1017], after the sentence “Because the district court did not order the government to respond to Withers’s motion, the government never raised an affirmative procedural bar defense in the district court,” add the following sentence and citation: “Further, the…
2Cases cited37 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Murray v. CarrierSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Arizona v. FulminanteSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Bousley v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Puckett v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by136 opinions
- Patrick Neiss v. Pete BludworthCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2024
- Medina, Hector RolandoCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2011
- Damous Nettles v. Randy GroundsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2016
- Visciotti v. MartelCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2016
- United States v. DeanDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 2016
131 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.