Legal Opinion

United States v. Dean

District Court, D. Oregon

Decided March 15, 2016No. Case No. 3:13-cr-00137-SIPublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER

Michael H. Simon, District Judge.

On November 18, 2015, Defendant Frederic Russell Dean (“Dean”) moved to vacate, set aside, or correct his sentence under 28 U.S.C. § 2255. Dean argues that the Supreme Court’s recent decision in Johnson v. United States, — U.S. —, 135 S.Ct. 2551, 192 L.Ed.2d 569 (2015), now establishes that the specific provision in the U.S. Sentencing Guidelines (the “Guidelines”) that significantly increased his base offense level is unconstitutionally vague and was adopted by the sentencing court in error. The Government agrees. The Government, however,…

2Cases cited78 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Miller-El v. CockrellSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
  3. United States v. BookerSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  4. United States v. OlanoSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  5. Crawford v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004

73 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. United States v. RamirezDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2016
  2. United States v. GarciaDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2016
  3. United States v. BercierDistrict Court, E.D. Washington · 2016
  4. United States v. WalkerDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2016
  5. Pressley v. United StatesDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 2016

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API