Legal Opinion

Danielson v. Cummings

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided May 6, 1980No. 45PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CARLTON, Justice.

The sole question presented is whether the one-year period in which to reinstitute suit from a voluntary dismissal taken pursuant to G.S. 1A-1, Rule 41(a)(i), runs from time of notice given in open court prior to plaintiff resting his case or from the time written notice is filed with the clerk of court. We hold that the one-year period runs from the time notice is given in open court and so affirm the decision of the Court of Appeals.

The pertinent part of Rule 41 provides:

[A]n action or any claim therein may be dismissed by the plaintiff without order of court (i) by filing…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. McCarley v. McCarleySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1976
  2. McCann v. Bentley Stores CorporationDistrict Court, W.D. Missouri · 1940
  3. Rowland Ex Rel. Messer v. BeauchampSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1960
  4. Southeastern Fire Insurance Company v. WaltonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1962
  5. Wood v. WoodSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1979

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. In re Pedestrian Walkway FailureCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2005
  2. Robinson v. GENERAL MILLS RESTAURANTS, INC.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1993
  3. Gillikin v. PierceCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1990
  4. Lowe v. BryantCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1982
  5. Cassidy v. CheekSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1983

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API