Legal Opinion
Rice v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
Decided December 17, 1997No. 97-246CPublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
MEROW, Judge.
This matter comes before the court on plaintiffs RCFC 14(a)(1) (“Rule 14”) motion to notice non-parties, and defendant’s RCFC 26(c) (“Rule 26”) motion for the entry of its proposed protective order. Plaintiff filed his complaint in this action on April 1, 1997, alleging that defendant has produced, or caused to be produced, power generating systems which infringe his patented invention described and claimed in U.S. Patent No. B1 4,896,499, entitled “Compression In-tercooled Gas Turbine Combined Cycle.” The government power generating systems at issue are produced under the…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Truswal Systems Corp. v. Hydro-Air Engineering, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1987
- American Standard Inc. v. Pfizer Inc. And Howmedica, Inc., and Biomet, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1987
- Bayer AG & Miles, Inc. v. Barr Laboratories, Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 1995
- Penda Corporation (Now Trienda Corporation) v. The United States, and Cadillac Products, Inc., Third PartyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1994
- Safe Flight Instrument Corp. v. Sundstrand Data Control Inc.District Court, D. Delaware · 1988
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Ross-Hime Designs, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2013
- Amergen Energy Co. Ex Rel. Exelon Generation Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2014
- Bird v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2002
- Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co. v. JonesDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2005
- Armour of America v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2006
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.