Legal Opinion

Barnato v. Second Judicial District Court

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided July 7, 1960No. 4313PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

By the Court,

McNamee, C. J.:

Petitioner seeks a writ of prohibition to prevent respondent court from proceeding in a divorce action on the ground that it has no jurisdiction over petitioner.

Michael J. Barnato commenced an action for divorce against petitioner in the respondent court. Petitioner, the defendant in the action, made the following motions in said court:

1. To dismiss the action because of lack of jurisdiction over the person of defendant.

2. To dismiss the action because of lack of sufficiency of process.

3. To dismiss the action because of insufficiency of service of process.

4.…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Clawson v. Boston Acme Mines Development Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1928
  2. D. W. Onan & Sons, Inc. v. Superior CourtArizona Supreme Court · 1947
  3. Dallas v. LusterNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1914
  4. Brockbank v. Second Judicial District Court of the State of Nevada Ex Rel. County of WashoeNevada Supreme Court · 1948
  5. Public Service Commission v. RussellWyoming Supreme Court · 1937

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Fritz Hansen A/S v. Eighth Judicial District Court of NevadaNevada Supreme Court · 2000
  2. Deros v. SternNevada Supreme Court · 1971
  3. Selznick v. EIGHTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT, ETC.Nevada Supreme Court · 1960
  4. Alitalia-Linee Aeree Italiane-S.P.A. v. Second Judicial District CourtNevada Supreme Court · 1976
  5. Havas v. LongNevada Supreme Court · 1969

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API