Legal Opinion
Clawson v. Boston Acme Mines Development Co.
Utah Supreme Court
Decided February 11, 1928No. 4541PublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtThurman, C. J.
The plaintiff, as assignee of certain alleged claims against the defendants, instituted this action to enforce the collection of said claims.
The defendant Boston Acme Development Company is an Arizona corporation, and the defendant Boston Acme Mines Corporation is a Delaware corporation. These companies will hereinafter be called the development company and the mines company.
It is alleged in the complaint that prior to May, 1919, the mines company was the owner of certain properties and mining interests in Morgan county, Utah, with the mining machinery, equipment, and fixtures used in…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Simon v. Justice's CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
- Security Loan & Trust Co. v. Boston & South Riverside Fruit Co.California Supreme Court · 1899
- Ziska v. AveySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
- Blodgett v. Lanyon Zinc Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1903
- Pierce v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1898
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Steiner v. 20th Century-Fox Film Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1956
- De Vas v. NobleUtah Supreme Court · 1962
- Snyder v. CluneUtah Supreme Court · 1964
- Earle v. Froedtert Grain & Malting Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1938
- John C. Cutler Association v. De Jay StoresUtah Supreme Court · 1955
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.