Legal Opinion
Havas v. Long
Nevada Supreme Court
Decided April 30, 1969No. 5650PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
By the Court,
Mowbray, J.:
Victor Havas, doing business as Courtesy Motors, appeals to this court from an order granting summary judgment in favor of the respondents, Mr. and Mrs. Phil Long.
The alleged facts are these. The Longs, who were then residents of Las Vegas, borrowed from Havas on six different occasions between July 9, 1957, and January 9, 1959, various sums of money totaling $4,013.59. The Longs moved to California in 1959, where they have since continuously resided. It is agreed that nothing was paid on the debt. However, Havas maintains that Mr. Long repossessed a car for…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Arthur & Co. v. BurkeWashington Supreme Court · 1915
- Cannavina v. PostonWashington Supreme Court · 1942
- Bank of Nevada v. FriedmanNevada Supreme Court · 1966
- George Dedmon v. Falls Products IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1962
- Forest Young v. Jessie May Hicks and Willys Motors, Inc., a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1957
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Davis v. Eighth Judicial Dist. of State of Nev.Nevada Supreme Court · 1981
- Union Oil Company of California v. Terrible Herbst, Inc., Union Oil Company of California, Dba/unocal, a California Corporation v. Terrible Herbst, Inc., a Nevada CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
- Fritz Hansen A/S v. Eighth Judicial District Court of NevadaNevada Supreme Court · 2000
- Simmons v. TrivelpieceNevada Supreme Court · 1982
- Union Oil Co. v. Terrible Herbst, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003