Commonwealth v. Smith
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
NIX, Justice.*
The question raised in this appeal is whether the evidence presented was legally sufficient to sustain the jury’s verdict of guilt. Fred Smith, Jr. was tried and found guilty by a jury on charges of burglary, theft and conspiracy. Post-verdict motions were denied and appellant was sentenced to a term of imprisonment of one to three years and required to make restitution of one-third of the amount taken in the *376burglary as well as being assessed the cost of prosecution. A direct appeal to the Superior Court resulted in affirmance and we granted review.
On October 14, 1975, a…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Commonwealth v. RobsonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
- Commonwealth v. RoscioliSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
- Commonwealth v. BoydSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
- Commonwealth v. GarrettSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1966
- Commonwealth v. MurraySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Commonwealth v. JacksonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
- Commonwealth v. ManchasSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
- Commonwealth v. BradySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
- Commonwealth v. StasiakSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
- Commonwealth v. CrollSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.