Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Murray

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided March 18, 1975No. 426PublishedCited by 106 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

ROBERTS, Justice.

Appellant William Murray was convicted after trial without a jury of murder in the second degree for the stabbing death of Hazel Smith. After the denial of appellant’s motion for a new trial and in arrest of judgment, 1 he was sentenced to serve a six-to-twenty year term of imprisonment. On this direct appeal, 2 we affirm.

Appellant contends that the evidence was insufficient to sustain a conviction of murder in the second degree. He argues that the Commonwealth failed to prove the malice necessary to constitute murder, and that he presented evidence…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. ClairSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
  2. Commonwealth v. GarvinSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1972
  3. Commonwealth v. PaquetteSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
  4. Commonwealth v. BoydSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
  5. Commonwealth v. ReidSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1974

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by106 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. StorySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
  2. Commonwealth v. FarquharsonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
  3. Commonwealth v. O'SEAROSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
  4. Commonwealth v. TopaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
  5. Commonwealth v. RoseSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1975

101 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API