Commonwealth v. Murray
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
ROBERTS, Justice.
Appellant William Murray was convicted after trial without a jury of murder in the second degree for the stabbing death of Hazel Smith. After the denial of appellant’s motion for a new trial and in arrest of judgment, 1 he was sentenced to serve a six-to-twenty year term of imprisonment. On this direct appeal, 2 we affirm.
Appellant contends that the evidence was insufficient to sustain a conviction of murder in the second degree. He argues that the Commonwealth failed to prove the malice necessary to constitute murder, and that he presented evidence…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Commonwealth v. ClairSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
- Commonwealth v. GarvinSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1972
- Commonwealth v. PaquetteSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
- Commonwealth v. BoydSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
- Commonwealth v. ReidSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by106 opinions
- Commonwealth v. StorySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
- Commonwealth v. FarquharsonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
- Commonwealth v. O'SEAROSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
- Commonwealth v. TopaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
- Commonwealth v. RoseSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
101 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.