Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Stasiak

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 8, 1982No. 639PublishedCited by 41 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CERCONE, President Judge:

Appellant was convicted in a non-jury trial of burglary, receiving stolen property, conspiracy, and possession of controlled substances with intent to deliver. Appellant’s omnibus pre-trial suppression motion was denied. Appellant’s post-verdict motions were denied and the appeal followed. Appellant received a sentence of three to six years for the burglary, conspiracy, and receiving stolen property convictions, and a suspended sentence for the violation of the Controlled Substance Act conviction. This appeal followed. We affirm. 1

Appellant raises three issues on…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. HarperSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
  2. Commonwealth v. ThompsonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
  3. Commonwealth v. TingleSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
  4. Commonwealth v. ScudderSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
  5. Commonwealth v. PattersonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1980

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by41 opinions

  1. In re T.M.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1990
  2. Commonwealth v. DavalosSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2001
  3. Commonwealth v. DavisSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
  4. Commonwealth v. OldsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  5. Commonwealth v. BradySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API