Legal Opinion

In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of Hendrick

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided April 2, 2009No. OSB 06-110; SC S056041PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Per curiam

The issues in this lawyer disciplinary proceeding are whether the Oregon State Bar (Bar) committed a procedural error in connection with the accused’s disciplinary proceeding and, if it did, whether the remedy for such an error is dismissal of the charges against the accused. For the reasons that follow, we conclude that the Bar did commit a procedural error, but that the appropriate remedy is to remand the case for a hearing before a new trial panel.

In October 2006, the Bar filed a complaint against R. Kevin Hendrick (the accused), charging him with various violations of the Rules of…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of HawsOregon Supreme Court · 1990
  2. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of PaulsonOregon Supreme Court · 2006

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of PaulsonOregon Supreme Court · 2009
  2. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of SanaiOregon Supreme Court · 2016
  3. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of HendrickOregon Supreme Court · 2009
  4. In re SanaiOregon Supreme Court · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API