Legal Opinion

In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of Paulson

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided October 19, 2006No. OSB 04-26; SC S53185PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Per curiam

In this lawyer disciplinary proceeding, the Oregon State Bar charged the accused with violating Oregon Code of Professional Responsibility Disciplinary Rules (DR) 7-104(A)(1) (knowingly contacting a represented person on a subject directly related to the representation); DR 4-101(B)(1) (knowingly revealing client secrets); DR 4-101(B)(2) (knowingly using client secrets to disadvantage of client); and DR 1-103(C) (failing to cooperate with disciplinary investigation). A trial panel of the Disciplinary Board found that the accused had violated each of those rules and suspended him for four…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of LenskeOregon Supreme Court · 1974
  2. In Re Complaint as to Conduct of MeyerOregon Supreme Court · 1999
  3. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of PaulsonOregon Supreme Court · 2006
  4. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of HarrisOregon Supreme Court · 2002

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of PaulsonOregon Supreme Court · 2009
  2. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of HendrickOregon Supreme Court · 2009
  3. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of HendrickOregon Supreme Court · 2009
  4. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of HendrickOregon Supreme Court · 2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API