Arquette v. State.
Hawaii Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion of the Court by
ACOBA, J.
We hold, first, that a plaintiff may bring an action in tort for the maintenance of a malicious prosecution as well as for the initiation of a malicious prosecution. Second, we hold that the Circuit Court of the First Circuit (the court) 1 properly granted the December 24, 2009 motion for summary judgment filed by Respondents/Defendants-Appel-lees/Cross-Appellants State of Hawaii (the State), Stephen H. Levins (Levins), and Michael J.S. Moriyama (Moriyama) (collectively, Respondents) with respect to the claim of Petitioner/Plaintiff-AppellanVCross-Appellee…
2Cases cited64 opinions
- Broughton v. StateNew York Court of Appeals · 1975
- Bertero v. National General Corp.California Supreme Court · 1974
- Stewart v. SonnebornSupreme Court of the United States · 1879
- Zamos v. StroudCalifornia Supreme Court · 2004
- Nelson v. MillerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1980
59 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Aana v. Pioneer Hi-Bred International, Inc.District Court, D. Hawaii · 2013
- Nakamoto v. Kawauchi.Hawaii Supreme Court · 2018
- Ching v. DungHawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals · 2019
- Andrade v. ChoDistrict Court, D. Hawaii · 2021
- Dural v. City and County of HonoluluDistrict Court, D. Hawaii · 2023
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.