Norgard v. Brush Wellman, Inc.
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
Francis E. Sweeney, Sr., J.
{¶ 1} Appellant David Norgard began working for appellee, Brush Wellman, Inc., in 1981 as a fluoride furnace operator at its beryllium plant in Elmore, Ohio. Within a few weeks of the start of his employment, Norgard broke out in a rash. The rash became so severe that it turned into skin ulcers. Norgard also developed other complications, such as dizziness, heavy breathing, and profuse coughing and spitting. Norgard was consistently treated at the plant dispensary and was repeatedly told not to worry. However, unknown to Norgard, Brush Wellman began to suspect that…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Fyffe v. Jeno's, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1991
- O'Stricker v. Jim Walter Corp.Ohio Supreme Court · 1983
- Browning v. BurtOhio Supreme Court · 1993
- Collins v. SotkaOhio Supreme Court · 1998
- Ault v. JaskoOhio Supreme Court · 1994
3Cited by30 opinions
- Doe v. Archdiocese of CincinnatiOhio Supreme Court · 2006
- Schmitz v. Natl. Collegiate Athletic Assn. (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2018
- Metz v. Unizan BankCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2011
- Tarnowsky v. SocciSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2004
- Travis Abbott v. E. I. du Pont de Nemours & Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2022
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.