Ballance v. Wentz
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
HIGGINS, Justice.
In order to make out her case, the plaintiff was required to offer competent evidence sufficient to permit the jury to make legitimate findings: (1) The defendants negligently failed properly to install and to maintain the small or auxiliary rig attached to plaintiff’s arm; (2) the failure resulted in the rig’s collapse; (3) the collapse caused a refracture of the bone in the arm; (4) the plaintiff suffered damages as a result of the negligence. A failure to establish any link in the above chain would break continuity and would be sufficient legal ground to defeat plaintiff’s…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Cutts v. CaseySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
- Nash v. . RoysterSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1925
- Roberts v. William N. & Kate B. Reynolds Mem. ParkSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1972
- Hunt v. BradshawSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1955
- Davis Ex Rel. Allen v. RigsbySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1964
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Crocker v. RoethlingSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2009
- Bost v. RileyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1980
- Tripp v. PateCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1980
- Thompson v. LockertCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1977
- Farlow v. North Carolina State Board of Chiropractic ExaminersCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1985
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.