Legal Opinion

Farlow v. North Carolina State Board of Chiropractic Examiners

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided August 6, 1985No. 8410SC986PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WEBB, Judge.

In his first assignment of error the appellant argues that certain findings of fact were not supported by substantial competent evidence in view of the entire record. The Board found as a fact that the appellant requested insurance information prior to seeing Ms. Byerly and her two children. The appellant contends this find ing of fact is not supported by the evidence. Ms. Byerly testified that before Dr. Farlow treated her he asked about her insurance. When she told him she had Blue Cross and Blue Shield and gave him the name of the insurance company of the driver of the vehicle…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Connally v. General Construction Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
  2. United States Ex Rel. Accardi v. ShaughnessySupreme Court of the United States · 1954
  3. Service v. DullesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  4. Vitarelli v. SeatonSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
  5. American Farm Lines v. Black Ball Freight ServiceSupreme Court of the United States · 1970

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Levinson v. Connecticut Board of Chiropractic ExaminersSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1989
  2. Leiphart v. North Carolina School of the ArtsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1986
  3. Tully v. City of WilmingtonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2018
  4. Wal-Mart Stores East, Inc. v. HintonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2009
  5. North Carolina Department of Justice v. EakerCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1988

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API