Legal Opinion

In the Interest of L.J.D.

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided November 15, 2011No. ED 96322PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KURT S. ODENWALD, Chief Judge.

Introduction

Appellant Sara Welch (Welch) appeals from the trial court’s order terminating her parental rights to her minor child L.J.D. The trial court found substantial evidence to terminate Welch’s parental rights under Sections 211.447.5(2) and (3), RSMo. Cum.Supp.2010 1 In particular, the trial court held Welch’s mental retardation and depression were permanent or near-permanent mental illnesses that rendered her incapable of knowingly providing care to L.J.D.; Welch continuously failed to provide an adequate home for L.J.D.; and Welch made only minimal…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Santosky v. KramerSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  2. Troxel v. GranvilleSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  3. In the Interest of K.A.W.Supreme Court of Missouri · 2004
  4. Missouri Department of Social Services, Division of Family Services v. T.H.Supreme Court of Missouri · 2005
  5. In the Interest of C.W.Supreme Court of Missouri · 2007

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. K.D.P. v. Juvenile OfficerMissouri Court of Appeals · 2012
  2. In the Interest of D.J.G v. A.B.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2014
  3. S.L.J. v. Greene County Juvenile OfficeMissouri Court of Appeals · 2012
  4. Juvenile Officer v. A.R.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2017
  5. Mo. Dep't of Soc. Servs. v. K.M.U. (In re Interest of M.J.M.)Missouri Court of Appeals · 2018

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API