Missouri Department of Social Services, Division of Family Services v. T.H.
Supreme Court of Missouri
1Opinion of the Court
LAURA DENVER STITH, Judge.
T.H., Jr., (Father) appeals the termination of his parental rights to his daughter, S.M.H. He alleges that the trial judge erred in failing to grant his motion for change of judge under Rule 126.01 and, further, that there was insufficient evidence to support the termination. This Court holds a petition to terminate parental rights is a “supplemental petition” for purposes of Rule 126.01. As such, Father was not entitled to a change of judge under Rule 126.01 upon the filing of the petition to terminate his parental rights where, as here, the petition was to be *359heard…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Murphy v. CarronSupreme Court of Missouri · 1976
- Santosky v. KramerSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- In the Interest of K.A.W.Supreme Court of Missouri · 2004
- Junior College District of St. Louis v. City of St. LouisSupreme Court of Missouri · 2004
- In the Interest of M.D.R.Supreme Court of Missouri · 2004
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by69 opinions
- S.M. v. E.M.B.R.Supreme Court of Missouri · 2011
- S.S.S. v. C.V.S.Supreme Court of Missouri · 2017
- Adoption of C.M. v. E.M.B.R.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2013
- In the INTEREST OF K.M.A.-B.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2016
- In re the Interest of K.M.C.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2007
64 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.