Legal Opinion

In the Interest of D.J.G v. A.B.

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided March 31, 2014No. SD 32887PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDon E. Burrell, J.

A.B. (“Father”) appeals the July 2013 judgment that terminated his parental rights in, to, and over his child, D.J.G., who was born in 2008 (“Child”). See section 211.447.1 Father contends the trial court erred in terminating his parental rights because: 1) “[tjhere was no clear, cogent and convincing evidence that [Father] failed to rectify the situation” as he “substantially complied with the terms of [the] service agreement, there was ... not a mental condition that prevented [Father] from being a parentf,]” and he was not offered appropriate services; 2) “the preponderance of [the]…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. In the Interest of K.A.W.Supreme Court of Missouri · 2004
  2. In the Interest of P.L.O.Supreme Court of Missouri · 2004
  3. S.M. v. E.M.B.R.Supreme Court of Missouri · 2011
  4. Missouri Department of Social Services, Division of Family Services v. T.H.Supreme Court of Missouri · 2005
  5. In the Interest of B.H.Supreme Court of Missouri · 2011

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. S.S.S. v. C.V.S.Supreme Court of Missouri · 2017
  2. Dennis Fastnacht and Joni Fastnacht v. Teng GeMissouri Court of Appeals · 2016
  3. Evelyn J. Randall, by Thomas Randall, Personal Representative of The Estate of Evelyn Randall v. Eddie D. Randall and Donald Orville RandallMissouri Court of Appeals · 2016
  4. S.S.S. v. C.V.S.Supreme Court of Missouri · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API