Legal Opinion

Mutual Life Insurance Co. v. Blodgett

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided June 20, 1894No. 182PublishedCited by 10 opinions

Appeal from Fannin. Tried below before Hon. B. D. McLellan. 1. The beneficiary must have an insurable interest in the life of the insured, and it must affirmatively so appear in bis pleadings. Burton v. Ins. Co., 119 Ind., 207; Ins. Co. v. Hogan, 80 111., 35, 38; Lyleton v. Ins. Co., 66 Mo., 63, 75; Freeman v. Ins. Co., 38 Barb., 247; Cbrisman v. Ins. Co., 16 Ore., 283; Ins. Co. v. Ins. Co., 81 Ala., 328; Warnok v. Davis, 104 H. S., 775; Ins. Co. t.

Read the full summary

Appeal from Fannin. Tried below before Hon. B. D. McLellan. 1. The beneficiary must have an insurable interest in the life of the insured, and it must affirmatively so appear in bis pleadings. Burton v. Ins. Co., 119 Ind., 207; Ins. Co. v. Hogan, 80 111., 35, 38; Lyleton v. Ins. Co., 66 Mo., 63, 75; Freeman v. Ins. Co., 38 Barb., 247; Cbrisman v. Ins. Co., 16 Ore., 283; Ins. Co. v. Ins. Co., 81 Ala., 328; Warnok v. Davis, 104 H. S., 775; Ins. Co. t. Bunch, 19 S, W. Rep., 25; Whitmore v. Ins. Co., 100 IT. S., 36; Ins. Co. v. Hayard, 41 Ind., 116; Ins. Co. v. Hoyt, 9 N. W. Rep., 497; Brockaway…

1Opinion of the Court

FINLEY, Associate Justice.

This is a suit upon a life insurance policy, showing upon its face to have been taken out by Mrs. Lucinda J. Downey, upon her life, in favor of her grandson, J. A. Blodgett, the plaintiff in the court below. The defendant answered by exceptions, general and special, general denial, and special answer setting-up a want of insurable interest in plaintiff, and breach of warranties on the part of the insured. The trial resulted in a verdict and judgment for plaintiff for amount of policy, attorney’s fees, and 12 per cent damages. From this judgment the insurance company…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Moulor v. American Life InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
  2. Missouri Pacific Railway Co. v. MacKeySupreme Court of the United States · 1888
  3. Pembina Consolidated Silver Mining & Milling Co. v. PennsylvaniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
  4. Pacific Express Co. v. SeibertSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
  5. Continental Life Insurance v. ChamberlainSupreme Court of the United States · 1889

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Schumann v. Brownwood Mut. Life Ins.Texas Commission of Appeals · 1926
  2. Manhattan Life Ins. Co. v. CohenCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1911
  3. Modern Woodmen of America v. OwensCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1910
  4. Pittsburgh, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. TaberIndiana Supreme Court · 1906
  5. Supreme Lodge of the Fraternal Brotherhood v. JonesCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1912

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API