Legal Opinion
Montgomery v. Wadsworth
Supreme Court of Alabama
Decided May 25, 1933No. 3 Div. 50PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
THOMAS, Justice.
The sufficiency of the bill was challenged by demurrer which was overruled.
C. D. Wadsworth, as tax collector, deposited the funds of the state and county in the bank to his credit as such official. It is averred, as to this, that as such tax collector he collected, and deposited in said bank, “taxes belonging to the State of Alabama and taxes belonging to Autauga County, Alabama, and at the time of the closing of said bank there was on deposit of said funds the sum of $1592.50 deposited to the credit of C. D. Wadsworth as tax collector * * * and of said deposit $612.50 was for…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Knighton v. CurrySupreme Court of Alabama · 1878
- Shaddix v. National Surety Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1930
- Montgomery v. SparksSupreme Court of Alabama · 1932
- Anders v. SandlinSupreme Court of Alabama · 1914
- National Surety Co. v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1929
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Powell v. Blue Cross and Blue ShieldSupreme Court of Alabama · 1990
- Williams v. ColquettSupreme Court of Alabama · 1961
- Lavretta v. First Nat. Bank of MobileSupreme Court of Alabama · 1937
- State Ex Rel. McQueen v. BrandonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1943
- Montgomery v. City of AthensSupreme Court of Alabama · 1934
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.