Lewis v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
Chief Justice CAPPY.
Appellant Robert Lewis appeals from the Order of the Commonwealth Court, which affirmed the termination of his workers compensation benefits. Because we find that employer’s Petition to Terminate benefits, its fourth, was insufficient under the Workers’ Compensation Act and our prevailing case law for modification or termination of benefits, the Order of the Commonwealth Court is reversed.
Appellant was employed by Giles & Ransome (“Employer”) as a truck driver. His duties included loading and unloading the truck using a forklift. On October 8, 1988, Appellant was…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Kachinski v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
- Pieper v. Ametek-Thermox Instruments DivisionSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
- Udvari v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1997
- Dillon v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
- Hebden v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by50 opinions
- Phoenixville Hospital v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2013
- Casne v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2008
- In Re Nomination of PaulmierSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
- William Penn School District v. Pennsylvania Department of EducationSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2017
- Hall v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2010
45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.