Legal Opinion
Sanitary Sewer Authority v. Dial Associates Construction Group, Inc.
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Decided October 19, 1987No. 03264PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
KELLY, Judge:
In this appeal we must determine whether the trial court acted properly in ordering a stay of an arbitration proceeding brought by the appellant, Dial Associates Construction Group (“Dial Associates”), against appellee, Sanitary Sewer Authority of the Borough of Shickshinny (“the Sewer Authority”). 1 We reverse.
On June 11, 1984, the Sewer Authority and Dial Associates entered into a contract for sewer construction in the Borough of Shickshinny. The contract provided that all claims and disputes arising out of the contract would be settled by arbitration in accordance with the…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Central Contracting Co. v. C. E. Youngdahl & Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1965
- Lincoln University of the Commonwealth System of Higher Education v. Lincoln University Chapter of the American Ass'n of University ProfessorsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
- Girsh TrustSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1963
- Kwalick v. BosaccoSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
- Kemp v. Majestic Amusement Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1967
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Duane Nordin v. Nutri/system, Inc., a Pennsylvania CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1990
- PBS Coal, Inc. v. Hardhat Mining, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
- Boyce v. St. Paul Property & Liability InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
- Dickler v. Shearson Lehman Hutton, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
- Fastuca v. L.W. Molnar & AssociatesSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2008
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.