Legal Opinion

Kemp v. Majestic Amusement Co.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided November 14, 1967No. Appeal, 118PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice O’Brien,

Plaintiff, Edward L. Kemp, who had installed heating and air conditioning in a commercial building, filed a complaint in equity against the owner of the building (Majestic Amusement Company — appellant), the tenant of the building (William M. Speney), and a bank (Peoples Union Bank and Trust Company of McKeesport). The complaint against Majestic, based on an unjust enrichment theory, sought an injunction prohibiting Majestic from encumbering or transferring the real estate and from selling any of the personal property located thereon, an order directing Majestic…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Meehan v. Cheltenham TownshipSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1963
  2. Brooks v. ConstonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1946
  3. Jury EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1955
  4. Reilly v. Walker Bros.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1967
  5. Farmers National Bank v. AlbertsonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1964

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. Adler v. Montefiore Hospital Ass'nSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
  2. DCB Construction Co. v. Central City Development Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1998
  3. Roman Mosaic & Tile Co. v. VollrathSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
  4. Lawner v. EngelbachSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1969
  5. Hankin v. HankinSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1980

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API