Legal Opinion

Groat v. Detroit United Railway

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided June 27, 1908No. Docket No. 68PublishedCited by 15 opinions

Error to Wayne; Brooke, J. Case by Catherine Groat against the Detroit United Railway for personal injuries. There was judgment for plaintiff, and defendant brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtMcAlvay, J.

Plaintiff recovered for personal injuries which she claimed to have sustained while riding as a passenger on one of defendant’s cars when it collided with another of defendant’s cars.

There was no dispute in the case upon the question of defendant’s liability. The controversy in the case was as to the amount of damages plaintiff under her declaration was entitled to recover. The suit was begun by summons in which the amount of damages claimed was $10,000. The declaration filed later set forth certain specific items for hospital bills, medical attendance and medicines; also loss of wages from…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Montgomery v. Lansing City Electric Railway Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1894
  2. Johnson v. McKeeMichigan Supreme Court · 1873
  3. Shadock v. Alpine Plank-road Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1889
  4. Borden v. ClarkMichigan Supreme Court · 1873
  5. Moerman v. Clark-Rutka-Weaver Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1906

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Kewin v. Massachusetts Mutual Life Insurance CompanyMichigan Supreme Court · 1980
  2. McDuffie v. RootMichigan Supreme Court · 1942
  3. Deffenbaugh v. Inter-State Motor Freight Corp.Michigan Supreme Court · 1931
  4. Tishhouse v. SchoenbergMichigan Supreme Court · 1926
  5. Gates v. BeebeMichigan Supreme Court · 1912

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API