Legal Opinion

Moerman v. Clark-Rutka-Weaver Co.

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided September 20, 1906No. Docket No. 97PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Error to Kent; "Wolcott, J. Case by Henry Moerman against the Clark-RutkaWeaver Company for personal injuries. There was judgment for plaintiff, and defendant brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtBlair, J.

Plaintiff seeks in this action to recover damages suffered, as alleged, through negligent operation of defendant’s elevator on September 6, 1904.

On the day in question, plaintiff procured from defendant a written order, permitting him to purchase certain door hangers at wholesale prices, with directions to present it at the back end of the store. Plaintiff presented the order to Mr. Fisher, a clerk of defendant, who directed him to get on the elevator and he would send him up to the floor where the door hangers would • be found, not specifying what particular floor. There were three floors in…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. Hallock v. Income Guaranty Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1935
  2. Deffenbaugh v. Inter-State Motor Freight Corp.Michigan Supreme Court · 1931
  3. Groat v. Detroit United RailwayMichigan Supreme Court · 1908

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API