Legal Opinion

Olney v. Beaman Bottling Company

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided June 26, 1967PublishedCited by 36 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

■Mr.'-Special- Justice William J. Harbison

delivered tlie opinion of the Court.

This is a suit by a consumer against a processor of bottled drinks seeking to recover upon a theory of breach of-implied warranty. The trial judge sustained the demurrer and'’dismissed the' suit. For convenience the parties will be referred to as they appeared in the trial court.

Initially the plaintiff sued the retailer of the product, Cooper-Martin, Inc.,- as well as the processor, Beaman Bottling Company: The plaintiff later took a voluntary non-suit as'to the retailer, however, so that its liability, if any, is…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Ford Motor Company v. LononTennessee Supreme Court · 1966
  2. Coca-Cola Bottling Works v. SullivanTennessee Supreme Court · 1942
  3. Kyker Ex Rel. Kyker v. General Motors Corp.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1964
  4. Oliver Corporation v. GreenCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1965

3Cited by36 opinions

  1. Michael Lind v. Beaman Dodge, Inc., d/b/a Beaman Dodge Chrysler JeepTennessee Supreme Court · 2011
  2. Wyatt v. Winnebago Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 1977
  3. Ellithorpe v. Ford Motor CompanyTennessee Supreme Court · 1973
  4. Browder v. PettigrewTennessee Supreme Court · 1976
  5. Clary v. Fifth Avenue Chrysler Center, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 1969

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API