Brown v. Marshall
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to Kent. Case. Defendant brings error.
1Opinion of the Court
.Cooley, J.
Marshall sued Brown in case to recover damages for a negligent injury. The facts which she claims to have established on the trial and on which she relied for a recovery are that in February, 1876, being confined to her bed by illness, at her home in Grand Rapids, and desiring to take sulphate of magnesia or Epsom salts, as a medicine, she sent her sister to the store of defendant, who is a druggist in the same city, to procure the salts for her; that her sister called for ten cents worth of Epsom salts, and was waited upon by one Adsit, a clerk of defendant, who delivered to her…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Detroit & Milwaukee Railroad v. Van SteinburgMichigan Supreme Court · 1868
- Thomas v. . WinchesterNew York Court of Appeals · 1852
- Losee v. . BuchananNew York Court of Appeals · 1873
- Morris v. PlattSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1864
- Norton v. SewallMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1870
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by40 opinions
- Troppi v. ScarfMichigan Court of Appeals · 1971
- Coca-Cola Bottling Works v. SullivanTennessee Supreme Court · 1942
- Crigger v. Coca-Cola Bottling Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1915
- Jenney Electric Manufacturing Co. v. FlanneryIndiana Court of Appeals · 1912
- Roberts v. Anheuser Busch Brewing Ass'nMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1912
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.