Legal Opinion

Brown v. Marshall

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided January 25, 1882PublishedCited by 40 opinions

Error to Kent. Case. Defendant brings error.

1Opinion of the Court

.Cooley, J.

Marshall sued Brown in case to recover damages for a negligent injury. The facts which she claims to have established on the trial and on which she relied for a recovery are that in February, 1876, being confined to her bed by illness, at her home in Grand Rapids, and desiring to take sulphate of magnesia or Epsom salts, as a medicine, she sent her sister to the store of defendant, who is a druggist in the same city, to procure the salts for her; that her sister called for ten cents worth of Epsom salts, and was waited upon by one Adsit, a clerk of defendant, who delivered to her…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Detroit & Milwaukee Railroad v. Van SteinburgMichigan Supreme Court · 1868
  2. Thomas v. . WinchesterNew York Court of Appeals · 1852
  3. Losee v. . BuchananNew York Court of Appeals · 1873
  4. Morris v. PlattSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1864
  5. Norton v. SewallMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1870

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by40 opinions

  1. Troppi v. ScarfMichigan Court of Appeals · 1971
  2. Coca-Cola Bottling Works v. SullivanTennessee Supreme Court · 1942
  3. Crigger v. Coca-Cola Bottling Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1915
  4. Jenney Electric Manufacturing Co. v. FlanneryIndiana Court of Appeals · 1912
  5. Roberts v. Anheuser Busch Brewing Ass'nMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1912

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API