Legal Opinion

Moore v. Palmer

Washington Supreme Court

Decided February 29, 1896No. 1844PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appeal from Superior Court, King County — Hon. T. J. Humes, Judge.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Gordon, J.

Respondents Palmer and Pontius are executors of the estate of J. Gardner Kenyon, who died on December 22,1892. This action was brought by the appellant to recover of respondents as such executors upon a promissory note which the complaint alleges was executed by the said J. Gardner Kenyon in his lifetime, in the sum of $20,000.00, bearing date *135December 23, 1889, payable four years thereafter together with interest at ten per cent, per annum. The respondents answered, denying the making of the note, alleging it to be a forgery, and further…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Eborn v. ZimpelmanTexas Supreme Court · 1877
  2. Andrews v. Hayden's Adm'rCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1889
  3. Tyler v. ToddSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1869
  4. Morrison v. PorterSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1886
  5. Williams v. StateOhio Supreme Court · 1846

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State v. SmailsWashington Supreme Court · 1911
  2. State v. FillpotWashington Supreme Court · 1908
  3. Smith v. HansonUtah Supreme Court · 1908
  4. Beem v. FarrellSupreme Court of Iowa · 1907
  5. Mississippi Lumber & Coal Co. v. KellySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1905

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API