Legal Opinion
Eborn v. Zimpelman
Texas Supreme Court
Decided July 1, 1877PublishedCited by 42 opinions
Appeal from Travis. Tried below before the Hon. J. P. Bichardson. The opinion states the case.
1Opinion of the Court
Gould, Associate Justice.
In October, 1871, William. *514Eborn of North Carolina presented to Zimpelman, the administrator of the estate of his brother, Thomas Eborn, (who at the time of his death, early in 1871, was, and for many years had been, a citizen of Austin, Texas,) a claim duly authenticated, on the following instruments:
“Borrowed and received from William Eborn nine hundred dollars, which I promise to return when called for, with interest.
“ February 3,1846.
“ (Signed)
Thos. Eborn.”
“ Received of William Eborn six thousand five hundred dollars, which I promise to invest in lands, or return…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Tome v. Parkersburg Branch RailroadCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1873
- Hunt's Heirs v. Ellison's HeirsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1858
- Cook v. CookTexas Supreme Court · 1857
- Howell v. HairSupreme Court of Alabama · 1849
- Udderzook v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1874
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by42 opinions
- People v. . FishNew York Court of Appeals · 1891
- Jester v. SteinerTexas Supreme Court · 1894
- Henry v. Roe & BurnsideTexas Supreme Court · 1892
- Cunningham, Admx. v. Fair Haven Westville R. Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1899
- Houston v. BlytheTexas Supreme Court · 1883
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.