Legal Opinion
National Accident & Health Insurance v. Davis
Supreme Court of Georgia
Decided September 25, 1934No. 10062PublishedCited by 26 opinions
1Per curiam
1. The first question propounded by the Court of Appeals is answered in the negative; that is to say, the principle stated in the question should not be applied where to do so would be contrary to limitations upon the authority of the agent as expressed in an application attached to and made a part of the policy. Reliance Life Insurance Co. v. Hightower, 148 Ga. 843, 845 (98 S. E. 469); New York Life Insurance Co. v. Patten, 151 Ga. 185 (106 S. E. 183); Davis v. Metropolitan Life Insurance Co., 161 Ga. 568 (131 S. E. 490); Puckett v. Metropolitan Life Insurance Co., 32 Ga. App. 263 (122 S. E.…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Insurance Co. v. WilkinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1872
- New York Life Insurance v. FletcherSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
- Lumber Underwriters of NY v. RifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
- Green v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1922
- Mechanics & Traders Insurance v. Mutual Real Estate & Blg. Ass'nSupreme Court of Georgia · 1896
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- John Hancock Mutual Life Insurance v. YatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1936
- Stillson v. Prudential Ins. Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of Georgia · 1947
- National Life & Accident Ins. v. GoolsbyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1955
- Reserve Life Insurance Co. v. MeeksCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1970
- Mutual Benefit Health & Accident Ass'n v. MarshCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1939
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.