Legal Opinion

Reserve Life Insurance Co. v. Meeks

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided March 20, 1970No. 44793PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Deen, Judge.

The general rule, as recently reiterated in Allstate Ins. Co. v. Anderson, 121 Ga. App. 582, is that the knowledge of the agent being the knowledge of the principal, the insurer is estopped to void the policy because of misrepresentations in the application attached thereto where the agent, whose knowledge is attributable to the principal, was apprised of the true facts. Where, however, there is a limitation in the application on the authority of the agent sufficient to put the applicant on notice that the insurer will not be bound by the agent’s knowledge in the absence of actual…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Stillson v. Prudential Ins. Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of Georgia · 1947
  2. Allstate Insurance Company v. AndersonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1970
  3. Clubb v. American Accident Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1895
  4. Grimsley v. SingletarySupreme Court of Georgia · 1909
  5. National Accident & Health Insurance v. DavisSupreme Court of Georgia · 1934

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Mutual of Omaha Insurance Company v. TruluckCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1973
  2. Bailey v. Interstate Life & Accident InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1980
  3. Cordell v. Greene Finance of GeorgetownDistrict Court, M.D. Alabama · 1996
  4. Jones v. United Insurance Company of AmericaCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1985
  5. All American Assurance Co. v. BrownCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1985

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API