Legal Opinion

Stillson v. Prudential Ins. Co. of America

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided February 6, 1947No. 15723PublishedCited by 52 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Wyatt, Justice.

The application for insurance in this case was attached to and made a part of the policy of insurance, and contained the following language: “I agree that no agent has the authority to waive the answer to any question herein, to modify this application, or to bind the company by making any promise or representation or by giving or receiving any information.” Answers to questions contained in the application did not reveal that the applicant had ever suffered from abnormal blood pressure. The application was signed by the insured.

The evidence disclosed that in the fall of 1943…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Clubb v. American Accident Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1895
  2. National Accident & Health Insurance v. DavisSupreme Court of Georgia · 1934

3Cited by52 opinions

  1. American General Life Insurance v. Schoenthal Family, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2009
  2. Prudential Insurance Co. of America v. PerryCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1970
  3. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. AndersonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1963
  4. Liberty National Life Insurance v. HoukSupreme Court of Georgia · 1981
  5. Jessup v. Franklin Life Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1968

47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API