Rivera v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.
Alaska Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
FABE, Justice.
I. INTRODUCTION
Evelyn Rivera twice injured her back while working at Wal-Mart. After initially paying workers' compensation benefits to her, Wal-Mart filed a controversion because its physician thought that she had suffered only a temporary aggravation of a preexisting low back condition that should have healed by the date of controversion. After a hearing, the Alaska Workers' Compensation Board denied Rivera's claim. She appealed to the Alaska Workers' Compensation Appeals Commission, arguing that the Board failed to make findings on material issues and did not evaluate…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- DeYonge v. Nana/MarriottAlaska Supreme Court · 2000
- Vetter v. Alaska Workmen's Compensation BoardAlaska Supreme Court · 1974
- Smith v. CSK Auto, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 2009
- Barrington v. Alaska Communications Systems Group, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 2009
- Leigh v. Seekins FordAlaska Supreme Court · 2006
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Shea v. State, Department of Administration, Division of Retirement & BenefitsAlaska Supreme Court · 2011
- Coppe v. BleicherAlaska Supreme Court · 2014
- Rosales. v. Icicle Seafoods, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 2013