Legal Opinion

Olmsted v. Buss

California Supreme Court

Decided October 5, 1898No. L. A. No. 403PublishedCited by 33 opinions

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of San Diego County and from an order denying a new trial. George Puterbaugh, Judge. „ The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtHenshaw, J.

This is an appeal from the judgment and decree of the superior court refusing probate to an instrument offered as the last will and testament of Marcus L. Olmsted, deceased. C. A. Buss is the proponent of the will, and he, with Martha Buss, Solon C. Buss, Ella M. Stockton, and others, stand as defendants to the contest. The contestants, occupying the position of plaintiffs in this proceeding, are the brothers and sister of the deceased. By the evidence it was disclosed without conflict that the document offered for probate was duly' exe*227cuted by Marcus L. Olmsted as his will upon May 31, 1893.…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Klauber v. San Diego Street Car Co.California Supreme Court · 1893

3Cited by33 opinions

  1. Brackenridge v. RobertsTexas Supreme Court · 1924
  2. McIntyre v. McIntyreSupreme Court of Georgia · 1904
  3. In Re Estate of SilvaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915
  4. Second Church of Christ, Scientist, of New York City v. KaufmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1945
  5. Shoults v. WilliamsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API