Legal Opinion

Mittal Steel Point Lisas Ltd. v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Decided December 3, 2008No. 2008-1040, 2008-1054PublishedCited by 92 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LOURIE, Circuit Judge.

DECISION

Mittal Steel Point Lisas Limited (formerly known as Caribbean Ispat Limited and now known as Arcelormittal Point Li-sas Limited) (“Mittal”) appeals from the judgment of the United States Court of International Trade affirming the Department of Commerce’s (“Commerce’s”) classification of Mittal’s composite rod as non-prime merchandise. Mittal Steel Point Lisas Ltd. v. United States, 491 F.Supp.2d 1222 (CIT 2007). Gerdau Ameristeel Corp. and Keystone Consolidated Industries, Inc. (collectively “Gerdau”) cross-appeal from the court’s affirmance of Commerce’s remand…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Consolidated Edison Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  3. United States v. L. A. Tucker Truck Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1952
  4. Consolidated Bearings Company, Plaintiff-Cross v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2003
  5. Corus Staal BV v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2007

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by92 opinions

  1. Dorbest Ltd. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2010
  2. Ad Hoc Shrimp Trade Action Committee v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2015
  3. Qingdao Sea-Line Trading Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2014
  4. Downhole Pipe & Equipment, L.P. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2015
  5. Palladian Partners, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2015

87 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API