Legal Opinion

(PC) Head v. County of Sacramento

District Court, E.D. California

Decided December 28, 2020No. 2:19-cv-01663Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 CHARLES HEAD, No. 2: 19-cv-1663 TLN KJN P 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. ORDER AND FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 14 COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 Introduction 18 Plaintiff is a federal prisoner, proceeding without counsel, with this civil action under 18

19 U.S.C. § 2520

for violations of

18 U.S.C. § 2511

(“Title III” or “Wiretap Act”) against defendant 20 Shelton. 21 On September 18, 2020, defendant Shelton filed a motion to dismiss on the grounds that 22 this action is barred by the statute of…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Gilbert B. Martinez v. Eddie Ylst, Superintendent, California Medical Facility SouthCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
  2. Hudson v. PalmerSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  3. Buckley v. FitzsimmonsSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  4. David W. Lanier v. Ed BryantCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2003
  5. Broam v. BoganCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API