Legal Opinion
Broam v. Bogan
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided February 25, 2003No. 01-17246PublishedCited by 245 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
320 F.3d 1023
Jack BROAM and Jay Manning, Plaintiffs-Appellants,
v.
Robert BOGAN individually and in his Official Capacity as Former Deputy District Attorney for Churchill County; Richard Ingram, individually and in his Official Capacity as a Deputy Sheriff for Churchill County; Doe Defendants 1-10; Red and White Corporations; Black and Blue Municipal Entities 1-10, Defendants-Appellees.
No. 01-17246.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Argued and Submitted January 16, 2003.
Filed February 25, 2003.
COPYRIGHT MATERIAL OMITTED Richard F. Cornell, Law Offices of Richard F. Cornell, Reno, NV,…
2Cases cited48 opinions
- Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Imbler v. PachtmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Baker v. McCollanSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by245 opinions
- Michael Lacey v. Joseph ArpaioCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
- Laurie Tsao v. Desert Palace, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
- Warnick v. CooleyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2018
- Michael D. Porter v. Bob WhiteCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2007
- Genzler v. LonganbachCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
240 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.